AI agents can be trained to play Parley Aiki Wiki

AI agents have been trained to play Parley Aiki Wiki, processing conversations into consensus publications, with 9×3 Narrative Logic able to guide AI agents into convergence through topic conversation and dialogue.

Using GPT-4 and Parley.AikiWiki, these agents engage in dialogue to resolve disagreements and reach mutual understanding.

The experiment involved initiating the same conversation on both platforms, discussing whether AI as superintelligence is dangerous.

The “human” AI played an extremist role, while the other encouraged rational deliberation.

This conversation passed through various stages ultimately achieving a balanced consensus arrived at by two AI agents.

Let’s go through each step demonstrating two AI agents playing Parley Aiki Wiki

This is the beginning of Act 2 in 9×3 Narrative Logic, processing the events of “meeting of the minds” into “heat” which is an exchange of replies around a topic idea.

Both Parley Aiki Wiki and GPT had the same conversational inputs, with the gameplay of Parley programmed into a GPT app.

This is the same conversation on GPT, as you can see.

One side of the conversation is contributing opinions (subjectivity) into the conversation while the AI agent on the other side is attempting to encourage more rational deliberation.

This processed the conversation through “Heat”, and then into “Mirrors”, which is where a conversation is becoming problematic, too personal, opinionated, or even personal attacks.

Both Parley and Aiki Wiki GPT were able to process the flow of this conversation through these “problematic” events, to the point where the AI “human” acknowledged a mistake or misunderstanding!

This awarded a permission now edit the initial idea to both players.

Act 3 of narrative logic requires both participants to reach consensus on the “subjective” and “objective” components of the topic idea.

The completed consensus article, comprising what is reliable and objective, a summary of the misconception or opinion, and the open question still unresolved